Showing posts with label gay marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gay marriage. Show all posts

Tuesday, 11 December 2012

Love, marriage, nature and dogs, with a side order of Leviticus

Today I: walked the dog, did the horses, collected cash from the bank, did some Christmas shopping, wrote some book, bought two delicious steak pies from the butcher, and had a spirited discussion about gay marriage.

I was talking about the problems of being a small L liberal. I gave my little riff about the reason liberals look so tired and peaked is that they are always having to see both sides of every argument. So much less exhausting to be straightforward Left or Right. The perennial cry of the liberal, I said, is ‘I see your point.’

My interlocutor said, gently, drily: ‘But I would say you are a woman of...’

Slight pause. Quizzical look.

Strong opinions.’

I shouted with laughter, which I always do when some of my more absurd pronouncements are nailed to the wall.

‘Well,’ I said. ‘I do admit there are some things where I find it very very hard to see the other side. Gay marriage, for instance.’

And we were off to the races.

The interlocutor is not, I should say, against gay marriage, but he likes a debate, and there was a little devil’s advocate in him. He listened quietly as I cantered away with my devout belief that we should celebrate love, not chastise it; that I could never understand why it exercised people so about who loves whom; that the staunch defenders of marriage as an institution should be delighted that more people want to join it.

I galloped off over the religious course, which involves Leviticus. This is where most of the anti-gay stuff is found, biblically speaking.

‘But if we all followed that,’ I said, ‘we should be stoning people for swearing and happily buying slaves and dutifully putting adulterers to death.’ I stopped for effect. ‘And we really don’t do that, do we?’

‘There are people,’ said my patient listener, ‘who say it is unnatural.’

‘Ha,’ I cried. ‘But penicillin is unnatural; agriculture in unnatural; forestry is against nature.’

Stanley the dog wandered in, to see why I was shouting. I looked at him.

‘Keeping domestic pets is unnatural,’ I concluded, triumphantly.

The argument from nature is one of the most commonly and madly used, by the fearful. Nature, they say, and often God too, meant marriage to be for a man and a woman, and the procreation of children. But virtually everything a modern human does is against nature, from heart surgery to government to living in houses.

Besides, as I think of it now, I realise nature is an absolute bastard, and I have no idea why it is held up as the gold standard. It is red in tooth and claw. It will kill you with tidal waves and droughts and freezes. Animals in the wild, so often held up as a beautiful free template of honest living, unlike horrid conniving humans, are driven by brute survival instincts, and will as often kill you as look at you.

Even something as charming as the horse has a ruthless streak. If a member of the herd is old or wounded, the other animals will shun it, and often move on, leaving it to die. In their world, it is quite right that they do this; their survival of the fittest means they cannot afford to be held up by the lame or the halt. If humans obeyed that law of nature, they would be considered treacherous and cowardly.

It is for this reason that I try hard, against all my instincts, not to anthropomorphise. Human and animal morality are so different that even using the same words for them may confound and confuse.

And yet, before I ran off on this gay marriage tangent, I was going to write about an animal thing that should carry a sentimentality warning.

I had a good and cheerful day yesterday, but suddenly, in the dark of the night, I whacked into the howling despair of missing my darling old dog. Because I am up against a hard deadline, and have about twenty things to do each day, because it is the Christmas season, because I have the sweetness of the new dog and the loveliness of my little herd of horses, I have not been dwelling on her loss. I think I had fooled myself into believing that everything was quite fine and normal. Watch me, getting on with it, not making a fuss. I am always conscious, in the cold weather, of how lucky I am, to have heat and good warm clothes and a sturdy roof over my head. All this conspired to fool me into a bogus normality.

Mourning may not be so easily denied, and must be done. Last night was a big whack, and floored me. As I was sitting with it, Stanley the Lurcher came into the room and sat like a sentinel at my side, gazing earnestly at me. I wondered for a moment if he were fretful at the noise, but the look on his face was not one of anxiety. He was just there.

The thing about this dog is that he is not, as The Duchess and The Pigeon were, a vamp for affection. He likes a bit of a scratch and a stroke, but he does not come to ask for them, as they did. He is not a kisser, and they both were (small, delicate licks on the end of the nose). He does not like to be without me, but he is happy to keep a little distance. Even as I write this, he is calmly curled up next door, taking his ease. This may be because everything is new for him, or it may be his character. Either way, the coming and sitting and gazing were out of the ordinary.

There are many reasons for dogs to do the things they do. I must be careful not to fall into foolishness or mawkishness. But it did feel like something very touching indeed, and I wanted to write it down. There was something peculiarly comforting about that dog, sitting as straight as a statue, waiting for me to finish my childish tears. So, as I make my daily list of lucky things, of the fortunes for which I am grateful, and which I feel most keenly at this time of year, Stanley the Dog goes at the top of the list.

 

Today’s pictures:

I got rather obsessed by the lichen on the trees, as you shall see. Also: moss.

11 Dec 1

11 Dec 2

11 Dec 3

11 Dec 4

11 Dec 5

11 Dec 6

11 Dec 6-001

11 Dec 7

11 Dec 8

11 Dec 8-001

11 Dec 9

11 Dec 10

Oh, these two little faces:

11 Dec 11

My tiny principessa:

11 Dec 14

The new hay mangers are a great success:

11 Dec 12

It amazes me that Red the Mare and Autumn the Filly look more and more as if they are sisters, despite being completely different breeds.

My favourite Minnie the Moocher shuffle:

2012-12-11

When people talk of thoroughbreds being difficult and unmanageable, I wish they could see this old girl coming for love. After this, she stood for ten minutes with her head on my shoulder, just communing in the middle of the field. It’s one of the best parts of my day.

There was a very fine game of ball this morning, and I took rather a lot of Stanley action shots:

11 Dec 16

11 Dec 17

11 Dec 17-001

11 Dec 19

11 Dec 19-001

This is the one who still makes my heart ache. My beautiful Pigeon:

11 Dec 22 Pigeon October 23rd

The hill:

11 Dec 29

Thursday, 10 May 2012

The momentous news

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

The rain fell. I rather oddly ate quiche for lunch. I never eat quiche, not through prejudice, but mostly because I do not much fancy it. I had a sudden seventies moment and had some. It rather reminded me why I don’t eat it very much. There’s nothing wrong with it, but there’s nothing hugely right with it either. If I were a whizz at pastry, I might make my own, but I’m mostly in ham sandwich territory just now, on account of the book.

I did work. I snuck a peek at the Chester Vase. I was dimly aware that Andy Coulson was saying things to Lord Leveson which seemed to be making people on Twitter snigger and make naughty Rebekah Brooks jokes. And then I, rather randomly, followed a link to MOMENTOUS NEWS. I mostly shun the erratic use of capital letters, preferring the quiet dignity of italics. But sometimes capitals are the only things which will do, and this is one of those times.

The MOMENTOUS NEWS is that Barack Obama has declared himself in favour of gay marriage.

This is huge for about twenty-seven reasons. The farther reaches of the Republican and Religious Right have been saying many disobliging about gay people lately; Mitt Romney even let a spokesman go, apparently because of his sexuality. North Carolina recently added an amendment against same sex marriage to its constitution. There appear to be some people who genuinely believe that homosexuality is the work of Satan. I do not think they are being metaphorical.

So, for President Obama to say this is a truly historic thing.

When I read the story, I felt incredibly happy. I also felt oddly relieved, as if I had been holding my breath. I had not realised how much I minded about this. I watch a lot of Rachel Maddow via the miracle of the internet, and she covers the darker shores of the argument quite a lot, so perhaps it had gone into my consciousness like a thorn, and lodged there.

I’ve never really understood the argument against gay marriage. There are lots of arguments with which I do not agree which I understand perfectly. I am a fairly big government person, but I completely get the small government side, and think it makes some good points. (I believe in government on quite an emotional level, and am willing to admit my faith in it may sometimes be misplaced.)

But the idea that two people may love each other and want to commit their lives to each other and then are told they may not because of their gender seems to me inexplicable.

I believe marriage is between a man and a woman, say the true believers. But why? Marriage used to be between a white man and a white woman; interracial matches were outlawed. No one could explain that either. History moved on; it moves now. The young people do not understand the fuss. (This is when I love the young people very much.) They have gay friends, they have straight friends; the vast majority of them cannot see the difference.

Oh, civil unions, people say. There is a faint whiff of the throwing of a bone. Chew on that, Gays, and let us get on with our day. You can have your piece of paper, but you can’t have real marriage, because you are not good enough. You are not quite up to it, like the Straights are. It slightly reminds me of the time when women were not allowed a university education, because it was felt their intellects were not up to it. The ladies were sentimentally lauded as the angel in the house, but could not go to Oxford in case their tiny pink brains exploded.

I was really pleased about civil partnerships, because it was so much better than what went before. One of the happiest days of my life was going to one, in the blinding sunshine of south London, holding a fat bunch of tulips. I called it a marriage; it felt like a marriage; it is being lived as a marriage. Now I think: come on, let everyone have the real thing. This odd first class, second class situation makes no objective sense.

I felt incredibly proud when David Cameron declared his support for gay marriage last year; I like very much that some Tories are calling it a truly Conservative argument instead of harrumphing about tradition. There is some backwoods backlash, but I really hope the Prime Minister sticks to his guns. They are great guns.

Beyond anything, it is a simple matter of fairness, and I think the British like fairness very much.

Love is love, says my wise sister. When you see love, why would you try and tell it it comes in the wrong variety? We need more love, not less. If people are so devoted that they wish to promise love in sickness and health, for richer for poorer, we should put up bunting. The human heart beats and yearns and lifts and falls just the same in the chests of all sexualities; it knows no difference.

All the same, there are people for whom there really does seem to be a difference, and that is why I think what President Obama did was brave, and fine, and, most of all, true. So I am hanging out more flags.

 

Despite the rain, I took some garden photographs:

10th May 1 10-05-2012 10-21-43 3024x4032

10th May 2 10-05-2012 10-21-49 3024x4032

10th May 3 10-05-2012 10-22-25 3024x4032

10th May 4 10-05-2012 10-22-42 4032x3024

10th May 5 10-05-2012 10-23-49 3024x4032

10th May 6 10-05-2012 10-28-04 4032x3024

Red the Mare, from yesterday, when there was some light:

10th May 10 09-05-2012 09-37-24 4032x3024

Myfanwy the pony:

10th May 12 09-05-2012 09-35-11 4032x3024

Their view:

10th May 10 09-05-2012 09-38-58 4008x1156

Pigeon, with patient, waiting for the ball face:

10th May 11 10-05-2012 10-26-14 3024x4032

And yesterday's hill, as today it is hiding bashfully in the murk:

10th May 15 08-05-2012 19-07-12 3094x1599

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

Slight change of plan

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

TWELVE DAYS TO GO.

I was going to write you a lovely little shaggy dog story, about me and competitive streak. What could possibly have been more fascinating?

Lucky for you, it is 5.45pm and I have run out of steam.

I was supposed to be doing Things Other Than Work this afternoon, so I could start the big edit tomorrow with clean eyes. But even the massive displacement activity of redesigning the blog could not entirely keep me from doing a bit of book. I kept away from the manuscript, and did some mild quotation wrangling instead. It’s always quite diverting to illustrate one’s thinking with pithy quotes from famous people. (The only problem comes when they make my point much more cleverly and funnily that I have. But still, good for humility.)

I have collected a lovely little clutch from Oscar Wilde, Dante, Roald Dahl, George Bernard Shaw, and the wonderful Hedy Lamarr. We featured her in Backwards because not only did she start her film career by running naked through a forest, but she also invented a technology which is partly responsible for making your Wi-Fi work today. That’s the kind of juxtaposition that tickles me. I was reminded today of all the interesting things she said, including the perennial cherry: ‘Any girl can look glamorous. All you have to do is stand still and look stupid.’

Now I am thinking I might just read a quick book on the Victorian woman before bed.

So the fingers have no energy for typing any story, shaggy dog or not. I am sorry about that. But it might be for the best.

 

Some quick pictures of the day:

The colours this morning were astounding. Here, a bright shaft of sun, coming out of a black sky:

5 Oct 5

5 Oct 6

The elegant sheep:

5 Oct 8

Moss and lichen:

5 Oct 8-1

5 Oct 12

Rowan tree:

5 Oct 9

The hill, from a wider angle than usual:

5 Oct 13

Dog of the Older Niece and the Man in the Hat, who is staying, having fun with her stick:

5 Oct 18.ORF

Pigeon, all gracious and moody in black and white:

5 Oct 19

And oh, the blinky eyes. THE BLINKY EYES:

5 Oct 20

Today's hill:

5 Oct 22

A faint thought is scratching in the back of my mind. Something happened today, apart from the latest portents of another banking crisis. What was it? Oh yes, the Prime Minister gave his big conference speech. He exhorted Ordinary Decent Britons to call on the famous bulldog spirit. So that is exactly what I am going to do.

But that was not quite it, either. What, what, what? Something really important, which is not being mentioned on the news.

I've got it. He came out, forgive the pun, unequivocally in favour of gay marriage. This will not make headlines, but I think it is HUGE. Big enough for naughty capital letters. A Conservative prime minister, publicly stating his support for gay marriage, not in spite of, but because of, his very conservatism. (Interestingly, this has always been Andrew Sullivan's argument, over at The Dish.) I think this is a miraculous cultural shift of the highest order, and if I weren't so tired I would do a little dance.

Saturday, 25 June 2011

Imagine

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

Imagine you are a politician. Imagine you could pass a piece of legislation which would make millions of people very, very happy. It would not just affect those directly named in the bill, but also their families, friends, neighbours, beloveds. It would vastly add to the sum total of human joy. It would right a historic wrong. It would advance equality before the law, in a land whose very founding elaborated the principle that all men are born equal. (The founders did not mention women, but I like to think they are born equal too.) It would make some people very cross, but their crossness would pass, as they moved on to find some other object of enragement. The ones to whom you bring joy, though, will have happiness to last a lifetime.

Wouldn’t you do it?

That is what Governor Andrew Cuomo managed last night, against high odds, when he signed into law a bill making same sex marriage legal in the great state of New York. I think it’s absolutely bloody marvellous. I bless him and all who sail in him.

Here is what some people looked like, when the news broke:

New York legalises same sex marriage, from the Stonewall Inn by James Keivom

At the Stonewall Inn in the West Village; picture by James Keivom.

New York Senate passes gay marriage bill by Cindy Schultz

And in the New York Senate Gallery, as the votes were finally counted; picture by Cindy Schultz.

Imagine you were a politician. Imagine you could put that look on people’s faces.

It even made The Pigeon smile:

25 June 1

Actually, that is such a big lie. That face is because I had just thrown her stick for her. Marriage equality, sticks; we all get our joy in different ways.

 

Now for some pictures from the garden:

25 June 2

25 June 3

25 June 4

25 June 5

25 June 6

25 June 7

25 June 8

25 June 10

25 June 11

As I took these, the sounds of a wedding across the way drifted over. People were laughing; there were three cheers; a piper struck up. How appropriate, I thought. Not quite a big gay wedding, because here in Blighty it is still civil partnerships. Go on, Coalition, I thought: why not pass a bill that makes people look like this:

New York celebrates by Jessica Rinaldi

(Photograph by Jessica Rinaldi.)

I came inside to write this, and heard the oystercatchers making a wild song outside the window. I looked out, and to my amazement, I saw they had their chick with them. I have never, ever seen an oystercatcher baby before. I know one must not get too sentimental about animals, but it was the most adorable thing I had ever seen. It felt rather symbolic on this happy day. The parents were teaching it to look for food, digging away for worms and then encouraging it to copy them. As you may imagine, I got rather carried away with the camera:

25 June 20

25 June 21.ORF

25 June 23

25 June 24

See how brilliant the camouflage is against the granite:

25 June 25

25 June 26

And off they go:

25 June 26-1

Talking of sweetness, could not resist one more Pigeon:

25 June 15

The hill:

25 June 27

I hope you are having a lovely weekend, wherever you are, but special greetings to the New Yorkers, who did a wonderful thing.

LinkWithin

Blog Widget by LinkWithin