Thursday, 20 May 2010

Low pressure

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

It is a most peculiar day. The sky is heavy and overcast; there is no air anywhere. Everyone is feeling rather aching and old lady-ish and light in the head. My sister says it is because a cloud of low pressure is hanging over us. All I know is that I have no useful thought in my head.

To take my mind off it, I am still playing about with my new camera:

2010-05-20

2010-05-201

2010-05-192

2010-05-191

2010-05-203

You can see I have not really got the hang of it yet, but I am bashing on.

PS.  Very glad that everyone loved the delightful Danes and their special bus driver. It does make me want to fly off to Copenhagen this very moment.

Wednesday, 19 May 2010

In which it turns out they really DO come in threes

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

Just like buses, after all, which turns out to be very apt, considering the content of this little video clip.

I sometimes get a little baffled by the madness and the sadness of the world (too many Leonard Cohen songs at a formative age). It is easy to read the news and feel downhearted: everyone seems so cross and intractable, and they will be spilling the oil and fighting the wars and roaring at each other over the despatch box and bitching from the sidelines. This morning, I actually set up a file on my computer where I am going to store snippets of good news, at a feeble attempt at balance. The first item was a lovely story about a man at Kew saving a tiny orchid from extinction.

I have enormous faith in the goodness of human nature, but sometimes it feels like I am hanging on by my fingernails.

All this was racing around in my head today when I paid my usual visit to the majestic Daily Dish. And there, in a perfect Jungian storm of synchronicity and collective unconsious and I don't know what else, there was GOOD NEWS. There were human beings at their sweetest and funniest and kindest. There was a man with a smile the size of Poland.

I can't introduce it any better than Andrew Sullivan did:

In Denmark, Mukhtar the bus driver had a birthday. He worked that day. His regular passengers had an idea:

 

I must admit, it did actually make me cry.

Hurrah for the lovely Danes, and their buses, and the enchanting people who drive them.

In which blogs are like buses

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

You don't see one for days, and then three come along at once. Or something like that.

I have done a very, very naughty thing. I bought a new camera. I must admit it was partly because of this blog; I was getting envious and fretful about all the people with the ravishing photographs and bored of my own point and shoot efforts. I wanted to give you some more of the good aesthetic stuff.

Then I saw a picture of the new Olympus PEN E-PL1. It was all neat and boxy and black and retro. I began to yearn for it. I had absolutely no excuse. I blame the internet. It made things too easy for me. I just said what the hell, pressed a button and the next day the thing arrived from Aberdeen. I was so excited I signed the delivery form in completely the wrong place. 'Oh, that was really ditzy,' I said, bursting into laughter. The driver was kind and humoured me, although if he ever had any preconceptions about flaky females, I just confirmed all of them.

I still don't know how all the buttons work, but it has many, many functions and I managed to stumble upon some of them. I don't know why I can't just sit down and read the manual like a normal person. I suppose that would be far too pedestrian and obvious.

Anyway, here are the very first shots from my new BOX OF DELIGHT -

P5190027

A little apple blossom from my fledgling apple tree.

P5190033

The tiny blue flower whose name I cannot remember. As Dorothy Parker once said: you can lead a horticulture, but you can't make her think.

P5190047

Look, look - it can even make a humble dandelion look sexy. We have a plague of dandelions this year, I have no idea why. Again with the horticulture.

P5190051

And how about this one, in nostalgic black and white. It's like a 1960s dandelion. It is the Twiggy of the dandelion world. It shall soon go swinging down the King's Road and pay a visit to Granny Takes a Trip and then go and catch a late showing of Blow Up.

P5190063

And guess who just happened to be ready for her close-up? Look at her, all dignity on the monument.

P5190067

Left profile? Oh, if you insist.

P5190069

Is it time for the chasing of the sticks?

P5190064

No? All right, if you must go on with this entirely gratuitous exercise. I'll just wait. (Her sister was away digging for moles, so did not have to endure the tiring posing.)

P5190076

A hellebore, drenched in light.

P5190022

And one final elegant blossom.

I was feeling a bit fretful this morning, and then this glorious contraption arrived and quite banished the blues. The only problem is that it is such a piece of genius that I cannot really take any credit for the results. It's the machine, not me. Still, good for one's vanity, I suppose. But don't you think these pictures are a whole order of magnitude better than those taken with my old bog standard compact camera? Lovely people at Olympus, I salute you. You deserve your name. You are perfect mounts of brilliant technology.

These pictures are for my mum and my sister, neither of whom are feeling at the very top of their game just at the moment. They deserve a little dose of delight.

In which I return

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

I am back. Actually, my little post-election rest came to an official end sharpish on Monday morning, and I have been writing three kinds of merry hell out of the new book since then, but for some obscure reason I have not posted anything on the blog. Sure, I could make excuses about having work, and my brain almost falling out after doing 3500 words in two days (not quite sure what happened there) and any number of other perfectly legitimate things, but it was not that. It took me a while to work out what it actually was.

It was: I was shy.

I know.

How can this be? We are a little band of bloggers, all for one and all that. Even when I am banging on, or galloping about on hobby horses, or talking about things in which some of you can have no possible interest, I have never been greeted with anything but generosity and kindness. (That element of the blogosphere is one of things I do bang on about, but it really does never cease to amaze me, and it was not at all what I expected when I began this enterprise.) I know that some people get properly ambitious for their blogs, and they are quite right to do so, but I rather love that this is a small get-up, existing quietly in an obscure corner of the internet, read by nice people who understand about the dog thing.

What, in any of that, could induce a sudden feeling of going into a party where you do not know a single human? (This does occasionally happen to me, and I get almost crippled with bashfulness. I do the things you are supposed to: plaster an interested look on my face, read myself little lectures in my head about how it's only a social occasion, not having your fingernails pulled out with pliers, bravely introduce myself, but it does not always work. Sometimes people really do not much want to talk to a complete stranger, however interested she might look.)

I can't quite put any of my fingers on it, but I have an inchoate sense that blogging works best when it is a kind of reflex, stitched into muscle memory. When I first started writing I took the advice of the great Dorothea Brande, who said that you should start every day by writing for twenty minutes without stopping or editing or even thinking. In this way, you build up the habit of writing so that it grows into a second nature rather than an onerous task. I almost think of it as training your fingers, and, if it does not sound too flaky, teaching your mind to go into your fingers. (Actually, that does sound perfectly kooky, but never mind.) In some ways, blogging for me is a little like that twenty minute exercise, except of course I do think as I do it. It keeps the muscles honed. So, the moment I stop doing it, I find myself tying up, stiff and uncertain, and it becomes oddly hard to get back into the rhythm of my stride.

I also think it might be something that does not bear to much thought. For an extrovert, that kind of person who loves to break into metaphorical tap dances at the drop of a top hat, there is no uncertainty in broadcasting thoughts to the world. For those of us more introverted, there is a faint whiff of presumption: why should anyone want to squander their precious time on my paltry thoughts on anything? This sounds like a very peculiar idea for a writer to have. After all, I have spent my life putting those thoughts on paper and hoping people will pay good money for them. But all the time I am acutely conscious that there is a kind of arrogance in it, and the moment I stop to think about that too much I become frozen in contradiction.

All of which is a very, very long way of saying: that is why I was away for rather longer than I expected.

I recognise there is an intrinsic absurdity to all this. It's only a tiny little blog, not particle physics or figuring out a way to pay down the deficit. It's not poor Mr Laws, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, who arrived in his new department to find a note from Liam Byrne, his predecessor, saying: Sorry, there's no money left. (I am not making that up.) I really should stop thinking about it all so much and channel those determined women in the Nike ads and Just Do It.

Lovely to be back, my darlings. It sounds a most curious thing to say, but I did miss you.

Today's photograph is the view over my garden gate, in last night's evening light, which was worthy of Van Gogh, or some other excellent painterly person:

May 17th 010

(When I say Van Gogh, I mean the light, not my photography skills. It just made me think of Provence, even though I am high up in the north of Scotland.)

Wednesday, 12 May 2010

In which I collapse in heap

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

I am exhausted by all that politics. Never have so many constitutional niceties and psephological calculations jostled for room in such a goofy brain. Also, I have been working at the weekends and am fretting about my book. So, my darlings, I am going to take a few days off. No writing, no blogging, quite possibly no thinking.

In the meantime, thank you all for your wonderful comments over the last few days, and bearing with me while I went all geeky on your ass.

I know some of you are filled with doubt and trepidation. I, idiotically optimistic to the last, am going to choose to have faith in the New Politics. It is really new. I still think this novel coalition might bring out the best in all parties. The small-L liberal in me likes the idea of a little more compromise and moderation, instead of yah-boo tribalism. I wish, of course, there were more WOMEN, but you can't always get every single last thing you want.

The economic times are grave, so it will not be all coming up

Good Friday 190

but - who knows? - it might not be a bed of thorns either.

Tuesday, 11 May 2010

It's all politics

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

For those of you who wish to think of something more edifying, like oh,I don't know, pig husbandry or molecular biology, I apologise. I can't stay off the news today. The latest fascination is a report of rocky splits in the Labour party over a Lib-Lab pact. I thought that David Blunkett calling Nick Clegg 'the worst kind of harlot' might be an outlier. Blunkett can afford to say what he likes. Now it seems that insiders like Jack Straw are not happy. If you are lost in political junkiedom, like me, you can read all about it here.

Tom Harris, one of the most thoughtful of Labour backbenchers, is also expressing his doubts. Like Mr Blunkett, he does not pull his punches: 'Why is Nick Clegg's opinion on who forms a government of any interest to anyone?'. (If you have time, watch his election night video, up on his website. It's very funny.)

The fascinating thing to me of all this is that it punches holes in the increasingly tenacious meme of a progressive alliance forming seamlessly out of the two anti-Tory parties. What people seem to be forgetting is there is a great swell of distrust between Labour and Lib Dems. This is partly due to bruising battles on the ground, in local and general elections, and partly due to genuine ideological differences.

Latest curiosity from the BBC news: leaders in the financial  community are accusing the politicians of 'lack of statesmanship'. The more jaded amongst us might mutter about pots and kettles. In the end, though, the markets have the whip hand, because poor old Blighty has to borrow so much cash just to keep her battered old head above water.

And since I seem to be liveblogging one of the maddest political days in my entire born life, I would like to give an honourable mention to the BBC's Matthew Amroliwala, who is reporting today from College Green, for sheer, unabashed chicness. I never saw a news person so elegantly dressed in my life. When the world is crumbling about you, it is reassuring to see a man who really knows how to tie a Windsor knot. (If you can get the iPlayer, you can witness his full loveliness here.)

As for how it will all end, I can make no predictions. For all I know, we could end up with another election next month. And another hung parliament. And Mr Clegg showing his leg all over Whitehall all over again. I start to understand why the Chinese saying May You Live In Interesting Times was considered a curse, not a blessing.

Ponies for All

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

My lovely friend Terence Blacker can exclusively reveal the Liberal Democrats' demands:

http://terenceblacker.com/comment/blog/what-do-the-lib-dems-really-want-an-exclusive-list-of-their-demands/

I also think, personally, that everyone should get a pony.

Exmoor pony

Tuesday

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

Forgive my abrupt absence. I think the election got the better of me. Yesterday, I had to lie in bed like an old lady. It was either low grade virus or actual election fever. Through long hours of wake, sleep and blinking drowse, the voices of BBC News filtered into my consciousness. There was something about Alistair Campbell and Adam Boulton and fisticuffs; the prime minister was stepping down, nobly and selflessly, or venally and deviously, but either way, not yet; the Scots Nats were bringing self-righteousness to new heights; the lovely Jon Sopel was literally and metaphorically throwing his hands in the air. Oh, and Lord Mandelson of Foy was plotting, but I don't know why that was considered news.

I am idiotically, congenitally, stupidly, pointlessly optimistic. Even during the expenses scandal, I kept believing that most of our elected representatives were pretty good humans who did a thankless job, mostly rather well. (You can all laugh and point now.) After the crash and shriek of NO MAJORITY, it seemed to me that the party leaders were rather calm and statesmanlike. I thought it right that Gordon Brown was standing back; I thought it bold and interesting that David Cameron was making his offer to the Liberal Democrats; I thought it correct and straight of Nick Clegg to stick to his promise of talking first to the part with the most votes and the most seats. You see, I thought, they are all grown-ups. All shall be well. They are men of good faith.

Also, I rather liked the idea of a centre-right and centre-left party going into coalition. I felt it could bring out the best in both, while the Labour party could go away for a while and find its heart and soul again, and then come back, renewed. The way I saw it, everybody won. Oh, and those pesky politicians really were putting country first.

So much for my idiotic, congenital, stupid, pointless optimism. Just as a beatific sense of decorum seemed to have descended over the political classes, everything exploded into plotting, and horse trading, and weasel words and every other damn cliché you can imagine. The Lib Dems, despite their high-minded talk of a new politics and putting the national interest above all else, turned out to have been having secret midnight trysts in candle-lit basements (or some such) with Lord Mandelson and Alistair Campbell. Everyone scrambled for their metaphors and similes: Nick Clegg was showing leg to David Cameron but doing the dirty with Lord M; he was like a Jane Austen heroine, or, according to David Blunkett this morning, a 'harlot'; he was a master of realpolitik or a shameless hussy.

Everyone had twenty-seven different opinions, and no one was shy about stating them. The public would want this, the public would want that, said the partisans and the pundits, neglecting to ask the public itself, which appeared to be going about its business with remarkable good humour, considering.

This member of the public feels a little sad and foolish. I really did think the high-minded moment might hold. I quite understand that the Liberal Democrats might prefer to go with the Labour party; that is of course their right, although they would only achieve a very fragile majority that relied on keeping the 'Others' in line, which could prove antithetical to the very national interest they keep speaking of. What I object to is the underhand, cheap way it was done. Just as I was looking at Mr Clegg and thinking I had been wrong about him and he was a man of substance after all, he seemed to be behaving like a huckster. You really must finish with one lady before taking up with another, if you are to make any pretence at being a gentleman.

It also makes the Liberal Democrats look as if they were, all the time, just after their own narrow interests. The irony is is that they have provided the worst advertisement for the very voting system they so ardently desire. If this is what every election would descend into, give me first past the post any day. I like to pride myself on being so damn fair it actually hurts, but this kind of spectacle makes me think: sod fairness, I just want something which does not make me feel embarrassed by the entire political class. I keep trying to believe in them, and then they do this.

My feelings are, of course, of no importance whatsoever. What matters is that we get some kind of credible government, so we do not turn into Greece, and the triple A credit rating is preserved, and a level of sanity is returned to the economy, so that everyone does not lose their job. I thought of that when Lord Ashdown of Pantsdown came on the Today programme this morning and said he had never known anything so 'excruciating' in his life. He did not mean for the country or the future, he meant for himself, because he and his party had to choose between the Conservatives and Labour. I yelled at the contraption: 'It's NOT all about you.'

Is it too much to ask that everyone grow up and do the decent thing? Could we have a bit more Captain Oates and a little less Simon Cowell? It's not as if we are in the middle of a boom, where one could have the luxury of fighting over the niceties of electoral reform and my STV trumps your AV plus. There is an economic crisis to deal with, in case no one mentioned it.

There. I think I might have to go and have another rest now.

No prizes for guessing what the Picture of the Day will be. At times like this, the only thing that can really cheer one up is an excessively adorable picture of some baby penguins going for a walk:

Penguins via Pixdaus

Friday, 7 May 2010

The Morning After

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

After all that, it has turned into the most dazzling sunshiny day. If I were feeling only very slightly more flaky than I actually am, I would say that it was the universe, telling us it will all turn out for the best. Dr Pangloss, reporting for duty.

I stayed up until seven, because I've never seen such a curious and unpredictable election in my whole wide life. I went to bed and dozed until ten-thirty, when I woke up to find that David Dimbleby was still on the air, box fresh, in his elegant purple tie. I heard the words 'hung parliament' and 'constitutional precedent' and went back to dozing. At noon, The Dimble was still going. Paxo also appeared to be up. My mother called: 'These old men,' she said, 'surely someone should tell them to go to bed.'

'Yes,' I said. 'Quite right.'

'Well,' she said. 'I'm off to see a man about a foot.'

I am far too goofy to have any useful thoughts about last night. My only faint notion is that, despite the Clegg bubble popping, we might find that we end up with a new politics after all. None of the parties quite did what they should. Perhaps it will have a transformative effect.

In the meantime, I leave you with a lovely green collage on which to rest your poor tired eyes:

Green Collage post election

 

Happy Friday.

Thursday, 6 May 2010

Cometh the hour

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

Whenever I go into a polling booth I think of two things: the Pankhursts and the Velvet Revolution. Emmeline and Christabel are obvious, although I should probably add John Stuart Mill to the list, for his quixotic attempt to introduce women's suffrage to the Second Reform Act in 1867. 1867. There was a man ahead of his time. And why The Velvet Revolution as opposed to any other? It came at a formative time in my life. I was just out of university and still shining with idealism. It was the fact that it was so calm and dignified. It was the sight of the candles in Wenceslas Square. It was that Vaclav Havel was a playwright. (I had just begun writing, and the idea that a writer could actually change the world thrilled me to the very marrow of my bones.) So that is why, however hard I try, I can't get cynical about the democratic process. This is not a glorious transformative election like it was in 1997. I remember walking down a London street the morning after, and the sun was dazzling down on the pavements, and everyone was smiling. It was as if the entire city was en fete, and anything was possible. Whatever happens, whoever wins, there will be tough times to come. But I still cherish the idea that I get to choose.

As I pull up at the polling station, Paul McCartney is singing Band on the Run. When I come out again, Nancy Sinatra is singing These Boots Are Made For Walking. This seems to be a portent of something, but I am not quite sure what.

Inside, everything is very calm. A huge union flag hangs over the hall, as if to remind us that it is, in the end, Her Majesty's government. 'Is turnout up?' I ask one of the election operatives. 'Oh yes,' he says. 'It's high.'

Outside, a gaggle of IPSOS-MORI workers huddle with clipboards. They are too busy gossiping to ask me anything. I am a citizen, I think in sudden dudgeon, don't I count in your exit polls? They are all very smartly dressed. I wonder if they dismiss me because I went to vote in my muddy gumboots.

Our local MP walks by. I have never seen him, in ten years of living here, although I looked up his voting record, which is impeccable. He looks much younger and thinner and more vivid in life than he does on his literature. He is accompanied by the most beautiful man I have ever seen. It is as if Johnny Depp has just arrived in the village. He has raven black hair and dark olive skin, and looks as if he has just stepped off the streets of Madrid. I forget all my dignity and almost crash the car, I am ogling so much. The dogs, unimpressed, yawn and stretch in the back seat.

Down at the Co-op, where I go for election night Guinness (I am going to need the Vitamin B to get me through till dawn) people are making jokes about a hung parliament. The lady at the checkout says: 'You know, all of them have some policies I like.' It is remarks like this that make me think perhaps this is not going to be the X Factor election that some commentators have been worrying about.

'Who are you voting for?' I say.

She puts her head back and laughs. 'It's a secret,' she says.

I get back into the car. I have Guinness for strength, the first English asparagus for a treat, and some salad for health. On the radio, the presenter says: 'Now we are going to talk about bus shelters.' Yes, I think, that's the British way. There's no need to get carried away with high-faluting election nonsense. Enough with the speechifying and the promises and the rhetoric. Let us consider the bus shelters.

Wednesday, 5 May 2010

In which no one quite knows what happens next

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

Voting by Getty images

I keep trawling around the internet, looking for more politics. I am sated with politics, and yet I still can't get enough. It's like some kind of psephological disease.

My friend P calls. He is an old leftish small-L liberal like me. We both slightly despair of Labour, and want it to go away and find itself again. 'Maybe with those nice Milibands,' I say, hopefully. We have both given up tribalism, and are willing to open our minds to a change.

We talk of the party leaders. P says something very, very unfashionable. 'I think,' he says, 'that they are three decent men who want to do something good for the country.'

There is a pause. 'I think you are right,' I say. I can be unfashionable too.

How the scoffers and mockers and cynics and sceptics would laugh and howl if they could hear that conversation.

Whatever else, it has been fascinating. There has been the shock of Mrs Duffy, the amazing rise of Mr Clegg, the slightly bizarre appearance of Mr Blair's astonishing tan, the extraordinary glide, from microphone to microphone, of Lord Mandelson of Foy.

I regret the almost total lack of any front line women. I felt uncomfortable about the political wives having to get a little Stepfordish for the press, but I think they have all comported themselves with marvellous poise and grace in what must have felt an entirely artificial role. The sight of all the pundits scrambling to reconfigure their prognostications when faced with the resurgence of the Liberal Democrats was highly diverting. The blogs have done yeoman's work.

My biggest prize goes jointly to Jon Sopel and Andrew Neil, for The Campaign Show and The Daily Politics, which were so consistently informative, entertaining and educational that they must have had Lord Reith dancing a tango in the great Broadcasting House in the sky. The BBC as a whole has been magnificent. Over at Newsnight, the glorious silver fox that is Paxo has thrilled me nightly.

Anything could now happen. The Tories could get a fragile majority. The young people could turn up for Clegg. The old Labour vote could collapse altogether, or make one final rally. There could be a Lib-Lab coalition, a minority government, or a Tory-Lib pact. There could even be another election in six weeks' time.

Best news of all: more people have registered to vote than ever before. So much for the gloomy apathy warnings before the campaign began.

Whatever you think of it all, do VOTE. Suffragists demonstrated, tied themselves to railings, suffered the Cat and Mouse Act, and even died so women could vote. In China and Burma and Cuba they dream of a proper democratic vote. Even if you live in a safe seat or think the whole lot of them a bunch of showers, put a cross in the box. It is part of what makes you a citizen. It gives you your right to complain. It is your moment to stand up and be counted. Vote, baby, vote.

Thank you so much for putting up with all my endless political rants during this election season. The next month will be a much, much calmer thing.

PS.  Best quote, just now, from a lady in Leeds, interviewed on the PM programme: 'It will probably be a hung parliament. It will be FUN.'

That's the spirit.

Tuesday, 4 May 2010

One more thing

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

In the last post, I blithely wrote that Labour had created 3,500 new criminal offences. It's the kind of thing that makes me cross: heavy-handed government, wasted parliamentary time, loss of civil liberties, etc etc, but I just wrote it down without thinking about it that much.

Now I can't get it out of my head. Try to imagine 3,500 criminal offences. What could they possibly be? If I had to sit in a darkened room and think up illegal acts, I would probably run out of steam once I got past the hundred mark.

So, like a gnarly old dog with a bone, I went to The Google. Here, just so you know, are some of the new laws that were passed in the Mother of All Parliaments in the last thirteen years:

You may not sell grey squirrels.

You may not impersonate a traffic warden. (Just imagine what would happen if you were caught selling squirrels whilst impersonating a traffic warden. The entire Crown Prosecution Service would implode.)

If you are a ship's captain, you may not carry grain unless you have a copy of the International Grain Code. (I admit I go nowhere without The International Grain Code; it is like The Great Gatsby to me. But I had no idea it was a legal requirement.)

You may not enter the hull of the Titanic without permission from the Secretary of State.

And listen carefully, you lovers of the Eastern Europeans: you may not import Polish potatoes, no matter what the brave Poles did for us in the Battle of Britain.

You may not, as of 1998, set off a nuclear explosion. (You did not know that was legal before, did you? So much for those Tories calling themselves the party of law and order. Pussies.)

You may not, however much you want to, obstruct the work of The Children's Commissioner for Wales.

Then there is something about unloading herrings and disturbing eggs but if I go on you shall slowly feel the very lifeforce being pulled out of you by legislative elves.

Now, here's a nice picture of some baby owls to take your mind off it all:

Baby owls via the BBC

(Via the BBC.)

Tiny postscript:

Interestingly, a lot of this nonsense was highlighted in the House by a certain Mr Nick Clegg, when he was the Lib Dems' home affairs spokesman. I am sometimes slightly rude about the implausibly plausible Mr Clegg, but absolute kudos to him for that.

Lovely bonus moment in this search: it led me to a piece in the Daily Mail, tipping its hat to the 'admirable' Nick Clegg for exposing the government's legislative madness. Is this the very same Daily Mail that only two weeks ago accused nice St Nick of a NAZI SLUR? Just asking.

One good speech is not enough; or, in which I risk derision by growing overly earnest

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

Gordon Brown speech Citizens UK

Out of nowhere, Gordon Brown, battered, bewildered and beleaguered, summoned a magisterial speech. It was heartfelt, and stirring; a far, far better thing than he has done before. It set the blogosphere and the newspapers and the Twitterati alight.

I wish I could have believed one word of it.

I am not a bitter Labour voter. I am not all vicious and twisted up inside, like some of those far right Conservatives who are currently going postal over David Cameron dragging his party into the centre ground. I am not just throwing rotten tomatoes at Gordon in a frenzy of spurned ambition and dashed hopes. I am, however, sad and disappointed in the party for which I have always voted.

I am also alarmed. I believe in government. If the party that believes in the benign power of the state loses the argument by comprehensively screwing up, then we are at the mercy of the raw free market, red in all its snapping teeth and claws. I want Labour to lose this election because I think it needs a period in the wilderness to rethink, regroup, and come back stronger, with new ideas, and new people. This sounds awfully finger-wagging and piously judgemental, but I think it needs to be chastened.

Let us not forget the things that have improved in the last thirteen years. The NHS is better than it was, although that improvement has been hindered by too much bureaucracy and too many centralised targets. Inner city wastelands have been transformed. Peace did come to Northern Ireland, which I never believed I would see in my lifetime. Civil partnerships were a huge step forward for equity, although I still don't really understand why we couldn't just have gay marriage and be done with it. Despite the scare headlines in some of the more hysterical newspapers, crime has come down steeply and steadily over the last ten years. With all the lurid stories of guns and knives, you would hardly know that the murder rate is at a twenty-year low. (When I was looking up these figures I stumbled upon one of the facts of life that most baffles me in all the world: the British murder rate is 651 a year; in America, it is over 17,000, with a population only five times the size. I shall never understand this until the day I die. It's not just guns; the Canadians and the Swiss have quite as many firearms. I cannot identify anything in the American character that makes it so much more homicidal than its British equivalent. But that is an enduring mystery for another day.)

Then there are the things that did not go so well. The Iraq war has so far cost northwards of £7 billion. Put that together with the £12 billion wasted on the notorious NHS IT system that does not work, and you are talking about some real money that could have been used to pay down the deficit, or, oh, I don't know, build a school or set up some apprentice schemes, or something useful. There are 3,500 new criminal offences on the books, including a law that enables the police to declare demonstration illegal. (I have not checked this number, but it comes from George Monbiot, a man of the left, and I am going to believe that his figures are accurate.)

Inequality, under the party of social justice, is higher than it was under the last Conservative government, which is hysterically ironic when you still hear people saying that the Tories just live to look after their rich friends. The asylum system, which is something of which I would like to be proud, is byzantine and sometimes cruel. I know someone who has had personal experience of it, and his stories make Kafka look like Andy Pandy. Between 20% and 25% of our children cannot read. Last year, Professor Robin Alexander of the Cambridge Primary review went further, and called the entire education system 'fundamentally deficient'.

So when Mr Brown comes out and talks passionately of his commitment to the poor, as he did yesterday, I feel a little baffled. Soaring deficits and a national debt of over £900 billion did not just happen by accident. They have to be paid for somehow. Jobs will go, public services will suffer, direct and indirect taxes will be raised. The poorest will always suffer most in that situation. The problems in the education system also hit the most vulnerable disproportionately. More affluent parents may have the time or money to plug the gaps. A single mother on the minimum wage may not.

The most glaring disconnect came last night in the form of a mother and daughter. Before Gordon Brown's speech, a young girl spoke movingly of her mother's struggles on a very low income, breaking down into tears at the memory of spending a week living on nothing but lentils because they could not afford proper food. The Prime Minister put his arm round her in sympathy. Yet where did this poor mother work? She was a cleaner at The Treasury. Today, on The Daily Politics, Andrew Neil rightly asked Douglas Alexander how this could be, after thirteen years of a Labour government committed to ameliorating poverty. Mr Alexander, in an extraordinary statement, shifted responsibility by saying that the cleaning at The Treasury was done by contractors, as if that somehow made it nothing to do with him.

That is why, however passionately Gordon Brown spoke of justice and dignity and fairness, I could only look on and think: a day late and a dollar short. He spoke as if that mother and daughter's plight were nothing to do with him, because he was on the side of the angels. I think he really does believe that, in his own mind. But standing in front of him were two people who were living proof that words are  not enough.

Monday, 3 May 2010

At Last

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

The blossom has arrived. I cannot tell you what a banner day this is. I have been looking enviously at pictures from the south, all gaudy and verdant and fecund. Now, at last, our tiny white cherry flowers are starting to unfurl. The horse chestnuts have their first fledgling leaves, and even the beeches are showing signs of life.

The dogs and I just went out into the amber evening light, and there was blossom:

May 3rd 011

And green leaves:

May 3rd 012

And the glory of the dry stone wall, of which you know I never tire:

May 3rd 005

And more blossom:

May 3rd 014

And the light dying on the hill:

May 3rd 019

And, of course, two exceptionally photogenic old ladies:

May 3rd 026

May 3rd 033

May 3rd 035

It was all very calm and quiet and the election felt a long way away.

Talking of the election: I have no deep political thoughts today, except that I cannot see how all this is going to end, not just on Friday morning, but in the long run. The only thing I would say is that I am growing a little weary of hearing all the party leaders devote their entire pitch to 'ordinary hard-working families'. I am not sure I qualify. I start to yearn for a party which would like to appeal to cussed single feminists with dogs.

Happy bank holiday.

PS Oh, meant to say - Virginia the Pig SURVIVED. It was a horrid mystery illness and we still are not sure quite what ailed her. She took on a terrible death rattle at one stage, but the tough old dear pulled through. I took her apples this morning and she looked really quite perky.

PPS Did I thank properly for all the incredibly kind comments about the book? Thank you, thank you.

PPPS Sarah was on Woman's Hour this morning. Do go and listen if you can get the iplayer. I think she has the most magnificent radio voice.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00s5h62/Womans_Hour_03_05_2010/

Sunday, 2 May 2010

An unscheduled culinary rant

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

I was not going to blog today. I was going to have a nice, quiet weekend off. My plan was mostly to stare into space. Then I read about the Delia Smith Risotto Scandal, as it shall now be known, and could contain myself no more.

I have never like Delia Smith's recipes; they are too didactic and unimaginative, with dispiritingly long lists of precise ingredients. I always understood there was a whole each to each thing going on, however. I loathe recipes that tell me exactly what to do; some people find comfort and reassurance in them. I prefer the more abstract school of Nigel Slater, the pinch of this, handful of that, rather than the precisely measured exactly one hundred grams in a little glass bowl approach of Delia. This was never objective criticism, but subjective preference. Besides, the whole point of Delia is that everybody you ever asked said the exact same thing: oh, but her recipes always work. (This is too utilitarian and straightforward for me; I quite like the odd magnificent failure, in the spirit of Samuel Beckett.)

Then, today, the Patron Saint of What Works was suddenly accused of making the nation gag. Apparently her new recipe for seafood risotto was so revolting that not only did the resulting dish have to be hurled into the bin but the bin bag then had to be taken to the bottom of the garden because the smell was so ghastly. (I rather love that theatrical reaction. Could they not have just put it firmly in the outside dustbin and closed the lid? I have a picture of the black bag sitting malevolently on the far edge of the lawn, quietly seeping radioactive fish stink.)

Anyway, being fair, and considering the story was in a tabloid, I thought I'd go and look at the recipe to see if this was all a storm in a Le Creuset pot.

It is, without doubt, the most disgusting recipe I have ever read. It only takes a moment to realise that it would taste awful. For a start, she recommends using a jar of ready-made French fish soup. I know those soups. Even the ones in the very posh jars that you have to go to Fortnum's to buy taste thin and metallic. But it is not the ready-madeness that is the worst sin. It is that every schoolgirl knows that a seafood risotto is a white risotto. No tomato should ever come near it. Delia compounds this inexplicable error by recommending that you should serve this horrid mess with a rouille. And sprinkle the final dish with cheese. Not just any old cheese mind, but Swiss Gruyere. Let us just pause and ponder that for a moment; let us conjure the full horror. Imagine, in your mouth, the slightly stringy texture that Gruyere takes on when it melts, its distinct, sharp flavour, bolted onto a plate of Italian rice. Personally, I do not think any kind of cheese should come anywhere near a seafood risotto, but if it is to be added, it can only be Parmesan. It takes someone with no feeling for food at all to suggest a cheese that is not from Italy.

Even thinking about this bastard combination of the glorious classic soupe de poisson avec son rouille with the beautiful simplicity of a fish risotto made me feel mildly sick. To ruin two of the finest dishes in the world by grafting them onto each other is a culinary crime of the highest magnitude. I could imagine French and Italian cooks rising up in enraged protest, taking to the barricades with meat cleavers brandished in furious revolt.

But this is not all. After the initial shock of first reading, I peered beneath the ghastliness and found that Ms Smith has not even the most basic understanding of what a risotto is. She recommends 'giving it a stir from time to time'. From TIME TO TIME??? The entire, profound, ineluctable point of a risotto is that you stir it constantly. It is one of the joys of making it; the stirring becomes like a meditation. If you do not stir, then the special short grains will not release their starch, and it is this that gives risotto its creamy, soupy, unctuous character. Without that, it is just a plate of rice.

She also makes no mention of stock. A good chicken or fish stock is the absolute foundation on which the dish is built. (I will allow a little cheating here; if you flavour with saffron and a dash of vermouth, you can get away with using Marigold Bouillon instead, because we can not all be domestic goddesses and have real stock always to hand, but that is as far as I will go.)

There are many things I cannot cook. I have no talent for mayonnaise or yeasty breads or sauce Hollandaise. I have never quite mastered the art of tarts. I would be lost if asked to whip up a spinach soufflé (it's something to do with the folding of the egg whites that always defeats me). I am not a trained chef. But one of the things I really can make is a seafood risotto. I think it is one of the most delightful foods in the world, and I only bring it out for very special occasions. It is a dream of a dish. And now bossy old Delia has come and not trod softly, but trampled all over it with her crazy boots.

Forget Gordon Brown and Mrs Duffy. This goes straight in at number one as Gaffe of the Week.

 

If you want to see the HORROR, and the outraged comments of the poor duped cooks, click here.

Even the picture that goes with the recipe is like a car crash:

Delia Risotto

This is what it should look like:

Seafood risotto

(Photograph by William Meppem.)

 

I suppose I should put my money where my mouth is and give you my own recipe. I have adapted it over the years; I can't remember whether there was once a single recipe that I took it from. I rather think I just made it up as I went along.

Choose your own amounts, depending on how many you are cooking for. I'm really sorry I can't do precise numbers, but I always do everything by sight. For four people, I use one small onion, and roughly half a box of risotto rice, which would come to about 300 grams, and a double handful each of prawns and squid. Some people like to add mussels; I do not. I prefer to keep this very elegant and simple and clean, but that is absolutely a matter of personal taste. As for the stock, I would say a big jug, maybe a litre or so. Always have too much, although if you run out you can always add a bit of hot water. No one need ever know.

So:

Very finely chop your onion. This is important, because it must melt into the risotto, almost disappearing. You do not want nasty big chunks of onion disturbing your gustatory pleasure. Fry very gently in a glug of virgin olive oil, in a deep frying pan, until the onion is translucent. This takes about ten minutes. I usually add a little chopped garlic, no more than a couple of cloves, but this is optional, and there are some chefs who think that onion and garlic are not necessary together.

Then add the rice, Arborio or Carnaroli or whichever short-grain rice you prefer. I don't want to labour the short-grain point, because you all know that risotto is made with no other variety. Swish about with the onion and oil until every last grain is glistening; a couple of minutes or so.

At this stage, I add a dash of dry Vermouth. Many recipes call for a crisp white wine, which is also lovely. I think the sharp, almost liquorishy tang of the Vermouth brings something extra to the party. I also add a good pinch of saffron. This does two things for me: it gives the rice a glorious golden cast, and it adds another subtle layer of flavour.

Stir about with a wooden spoon for another few moments. Now you are ready to start adding the stock. Chicken or fish stock do beautifully, or hot water with a tablespoon of Marigold Bouillon powder, if you are cheating. No other stock cubes work; they are too strong and greasy.

The stock should be kept very hot. I keep it in a big pan on the next hob, and add it ladle by ladle. Let one ladle become absorbed by the rice before adding another. Stir, stir, stir, gently, dreamily, with love. Long strokes, no sudden moves.

Do this for eighteen to twenty minutes. People often say that risotto takes twenty minutes; I think it takes twenty-five. The rice should have no graininess to it, but remain firm to the bite. Just taste it to check.

So, about twenty minutes in, you have five minutes more to go, and you are ready to cook the seafood. Take your big fat prawns, raw and peeled, and the squid, sliced into thick rings, and cook them quickly in a big pan over a medium to high heat, in a dash of olive oil. This really only takes a couple of minutes, just enough time for the prawns to turn pink.

Taste the rice. I sometimes add another naughty slurp of Vermouth at this stage, for more va va voom, but go carefully. Vermouth is a bruiser of a thing, and can shoulder everything else aside.

Vital now, for creaminess and depth, is a big knob of butter. Salted or unsalted is up to you, but make it good quality; this is for flavour and a glorious velvety texture. Stir it in, and mix in the seafood. Now you need to check for seasoning: you may need a pinch of sea salt. Finally, check for texture. I like my risotto quite wet and soupy, although, again, this is up to your personal preference. Just remember, it will firm up a little on the plate and you don't want it heavy and clumpish. If it is too stiff, just add some more hot stock.

Once you are happy with all elements of it, add a good go of finely chopped flat leaf parsley, or, if you prefer, half a handful of sliced basil. I know the purists say you must never cut basil, but only tear it, but I like slender threads of green for this dish, and only a knife can achieve that. This final element might seem not terribly pointful, but it does add one more delicious nuance of flavour, and I think it is aesthetically vital, as it gives a heavenly dash of vivid green to the finished article.

Sometimes, I also throw in a squeeze of lemon right at the end, just to make all the other tastes sing their song.

Put it on a big white dish, and watch your guests gasp in delight.

 

If you want a proper, grown-up recipe with exact grams and everything, Rick Stein has a version here. You will see that he disagrees with me about the addition of parmesan. So does Elizabeth David, so I might be outnumbered on this one. However, dear Jamie Oliver does insist that cheese and seafood should not be mixed. Each to each, my darlings, each to each.

JUST NOT SWISS GRUYERE.

Friday, 30 April 2010

Random thoughts from a broad

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

I'm a little politicked out, after all that. So today it is just random musings, because it's Friday, and why not?

Here is what has been wandering through my mind today:

Would it be utter heaven to have a lovely, shiny black floor, or would you fall over every time you put your heels on and had one too many martinis?

Image via Dress, Design and Decor

(Via Dress, Design and Decor.)

Will there ever be a human being as elegant as Cary Grant?

Cary Grant

(Photograph uncredited.)

Why is it that I take so much pleasure in beautiful photographs of ordinary objects?

Logs by Mitesh Asher at Photographs for the Soul

(Logs, by Mitesh Asher at Photographs for the Soul.)

Where in the world are these glorious hills?

Rolling Hills via Pixdaus

(Hills, uncredited, via Pixdaus.)

The day I get bored with Jack Kerouac is the day that they carry me out feet first.

Kerouac via Visualize

I would love to know what Bird-in-Hand is, and why it is one mile away. Also, do let us all Use Other Door.

Signs from A Collection a Day

(From the excellent blog A Collection a Day.)

When I am an old lady, I am going to wear hats. And possibly gloves as well.

Henri Cartier Bresson 1951 avedon carmel snow marie louis bousquet

(Photograph by Henri Cartier-Bresson.)

Wouldn't it be lovely if the dear old British could make matches as beautiful as the Swedes do? It surely would help to revive our ailing economy. Give the matchmakers a government grant, I say.

Matches from Dress, Design and Decor

(Matches via Dress, Design and Decor.)

I am dreaming, dreaming, of the first asparagus of the season.

Asparagus via Best Room in the House

(Via Best Room in the House.)

And I wait too, very patiently, for the first sign of blossom. Nothing yet, but I live in hope.

Blossom from La Tartine Gourmande

(Photograph by La Tartine Gourmande.)

Thank you all so much for your amazingly kind comments about yesterday's vulgar post, and for all the good wishes about the book. I cannot tell you how much it warms every last cockle of my heart.

Have a lovely weekend.

Thursday, 29 April 2010

A shameless moment of utter vulgarity

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

Today is the paperback publication day of Backwards.

Backwards paperback

To mark the day, in a momentary frenzy of hideous self-promotion, I am putting up a link to the most glorious review Sarah and I ever had, by the lovely India Knight.

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/book_reviews/article5761534.ece

(It still makes me blush.)

I know that many of you very kindly went out and bought the hardback, for which Sarah and I thank you keenly and sincerely. Should you want to buy the paperback, obviously I must recommend you support your local, independent bookshop. If you do not have such a gem on your doorstep, you can also find it at Amazon:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Backwards-High-Heels-Impossible-Female/dp/0007357362/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1272551206&sr=1-2

I should not say this, I should not, I should not, but I don't think I can help myself: TELL ALL YOUR FRIENDS.

Right. That's quite enough. I do apologise. Now I shall stop flaunting my wares, and go back to my more sober preoccupation with the key marginals. If I carry on like this I shall be sent to bed with no supper.

Sarah on bodies

Posted by Tania Kindersley

Happy Woman photographer unknown

Sarah, on embracing all shapes and sizes, in The Times:

http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/beauty/article7109862.ece

Wednesday, 28 April 2010

Gordon, Gordon, GORDON

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

I had a little bit of angst yesterday after dissecting the psychology of the Prime Minister. It has to be admitted that I am not, in fact, a doctor. I read a bit of Jung when I was younger, that's all. Am I really fit to pronounce on the mental state of our Dear Leader?

Then Mr Brown, ever the gentleman, came along and saved me. 'Good, good,' he said to a certain Mrs Duffy, after she asked him about benefits and immigration. 'Nice to meet you. Good family.'

Then, in the car: 'Who set that up? It was a disaster. She was a bigoted woman.'

Mrs Duffy was a lifelong Labour voter who may not be quite so lifelong after that. Money quote comes from a reporter who spoke to her afterwards: 'She did not even know what a bigot was.'

The defence, being mounted manfully by Lord Mandelson of Foy, Andy Burnham, and Alistair Campbell is 'he's only human'. It was a human reaction, apparently. We all get crazy sometimes. It's very, very bad luck for them that Mrs Duffy is a widow who works with handicapped children.

The thing about the stickability of gaffes is that they have to feed into an already existing narrative. If some national treasure like Joanna Lumley described someone as bigoted, we would all assume that she had a keen ear for prejudice. When the Prime Minister hurls that word around, especially after saying 'good family', it confirms the lurking suspicion that he really does not like us voters very much. It illustrates the difference between public, smiling, politicking Gordon, and private, growling, telephone-throwing Gordon. It fits the pattern that, in his eyes, when someone challenges him, they are not only wrong, but bad.

The Only Human defence is not helping. It would be much better to say: it was wrong, he regrets it, he has apologised, now do let us move on to our plans for giving every single ordinary hard-working Briton a puppy. If Nick Clegg or David Cameron had called a member of the public bigoted, I do not think that Lord Mandelson or Alistair Campbell would have reacted more in sorrow than in anger. I suspect it would have turned out that Mr Clegg and Mr Cameron were not 'only human' but in fact the spawn of Satan come to raze our fields and despoil our women.

The curious thing about all this is it almost makes me feel sorry for Gordon Brown. I stick by my analysis. I think he is enraged, entitled, and unable to admit to his own flaws. I think he has made catastrophic mistakes with the economy, and I get madly grumpy that he will not face them. I wish he would stop doing that weird phoney mad uncle smile. I wish he had not sold gold at rock bottom prices. I wish he was not running a once proud party into the ground. I wish he did not have an unattractive tendency to blame the people around him for things which are his fault. I hold him culpable for the lack of kit and helicopters in Afghanistan. But after all that, he is still a human being. Mrs Brown, whom everyone says is very nice, loves him. He has two small boys who must see him not as failed leader, but good old dad. He is not running around selling crack to minors and drowning kittens with his bare hands. He is not evil. There is a tiny edge of the pitiful in watching him flail about, unable to get anything right. I take no pleasure in his downfall. I do, however, think it is complete.

In the final, Shakespearian twist, it was Mrs Duffy, a Labour loyalist, on her way to the shops to buy a loaf of bread, who, quite without meaning to, struck the fatal blow. The ironies of that shall echo around the commentariat until there is no more ink with which to write. It was, in the end, the unkindest cut of all.

Tuesday, 27 April 2010

Whoah, Prime Minister

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

Gordon Brown outside Number Ten

I am going to admit something very, very embarrassing. When I was young and foolish and believed in new dawns, I had a tiny little crush on Gordon Brown.

I KNOW.

You have to cast your mind back to the late nineties, when the talk was all of Tory sleaze. The papers were filled with Neil Hamilton and Jonathan Aitken. The government had lost economic credibility after the ERM debacle, and suffered from a sense of drift. Everyone was making jokes about John Major's cones hotline and that speech he made about old maids cycling across village greens and the thwack of willow on leather. (For my international readers, this is not an S&M reference, but a cricketing expression.)

There, like two beacons of hope on the horizon, were Gordon and Tony. It seems absurd now, with all that has happened, but they represented everything new, vigorous, exciting. They were young and serious and determined; they seemed even idealistic. Brown appeared not dour and livid, but serious and brooding. I actually got a little thrill when he started talking about macro-economics.

Something terrible happened to him along the way. I think he allowed his burning desire for the top job to eat away at him. He sat, deep in the Treasury, biting his nails, furious that Blair, with his easy charm and plausible manner, was getting all the love. Then, in an almost Shakespearian twist, when Brown finally elbowed Blair aside and grasped the holy grail of power, it turned to dust in his hands. The economy, his special subject, his claim to ultimate credibility, smashed into a million pieces. There was not even time for him to take a victory lap before he was faced with the worst financial crisis since The Great Depression.

What is really interesting about Gordon Brown is that he often accuses the Tories in general and David Cameron in particular of having a sense of entitlement. The shrinks call this projection: you accuse your enemy of your own character flaws. I think what happened to Brown is that, in all those years of yearning and waiting, he developed a huge, fat sense of his own entitlement. It seems to baffle him that when he finally got what he felt he deserved, there was no credit waiting for him.

The voters, disgruntled over the expenses scandal, frightened by the massive national debt, disenchanted that the children still could not read, upset over the tragic roll call of fatalities in Afghanistan, bitter about the dodgy dossiers and the missing weapons of mass destruction, turned their pent-up ire on the Prime Minister. There was, it turned out, no love for Gordon. There is no love still, as the Labour Party languishes at its lowest point in the polls since Michael Foot ran on the longest suicide note in history.

Brown's view of himself is that he is a hard-working devoted public servant, who has pulled himself up by his bootstraps, and steers by an unimpeachable moral compass. He talks often of his values, and of his devotion to the people. He specialises in doing the Right Thing, unlike those shiftless public schoolboys on the opposition benches. In order to maintain this pristine persona in his own mind, he cannot admit to mistakes. One brick removed would bring the whole edifice down. This is why he continues to insist that the crash was nothing to do with him. It is why he ignores the fact that countries like Canada and Spain avoided a banking crisis. His hands must remain clean.

Just now, the Prime Minister gave the most inexplicable performance on The World At One. Martha Kearney is running an excellent series of programmes where the voters can telephone in and ask the party leaders questions. David Cameron appeared last week, and acquitted himself very well. He is much better when faced with real people with unscripted questions than in the artificial arena of the debates. He was polite, engaged, and articulate. Interestingly, he seems unfazed when people disagree violently with him, not in an I know better way, but in an each to each is what we teach way. He appears to understand that there are people who will always oppose his policies and his ideas, and that is their constitutional right.

Gordon, on the other hand, takes it personally. Where Cameron understands that people who argue with him simply hold a different point of view, Mr Brown appears to believe that anyone who opposes him is utterly wrong. He growled, he talked across callers, he hectored and lectured. I listened in utter astonishment. There were long moments where you could hear him actually banging the table. I could imagine Lord Mandelson of Foy putting his head in his hands in despair back at Labour HQ. This is not the way to win over the electorate. The voters are battered and bruised. My sense is that they would like not only a few brave policies and effective economic solutions, but also some humility and empathy from their elected representatives.

As a political performance, it was disastrous. It is very hard to understand why such an old hand as Gordon Brown would make so many schoolboy errors in one fifty minute slot. I think it is because, much as he talks of The People, he only likes them in the abstract. In reality, he is enraged with the electorate, for not understanding him, for not giving him the love, for denying him the garlands that they once gave so generously to Tony Blair. However many spin doctors or pollsters or body language advisers or focus groupers advise him, he cannot prevent this rage and resentment from seeping out round the edges.

It makes me sad. This is my party that he is leading to catastrophe. There are still great arguments to be made for the role of government, but Brown is not making them. He is just getting cross with the voters. The people are not right all of the time. They have quirks and contradictions and sudden strange mood swings. They can be nimbyish and demanding and prone to bizarre moments of Cleggmania. But they deserve better than this, Prime Minister.

 

If you want to have a listen, and have access to the BBC iplayer, you can hear the oddness here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00s2p7t/World_at_One_27_04_2010/

 

Picture of the day is a slightly pointless red collage, just to take your mind off all that election grumpiness:

Pictures

(All pictures by me, in case you didn't guess.)

Monday, 26 April 2010

In which I thank the Academy

Posted by Tania Kindersley.

The lovely Marcie over at Lemons and Laundry has given the blog an award:

beautifulblogger_thumb

I find this both very flattering and excruciatingly shy-making. It is wonderful to be acknowledged by other bloggers, but at the same time I feel this is such a tiny, fledgling thing compared to some of the tremendous and polished blogs out there, that I really don't deserve it.

It has made me think about the curious nature of blogging. The marvellous thing about it is that there are no rules; the terrifying thing about it is there are no rules. I like to do things well; there is still a part of me which is the small schoolgirl who wrote and rewrote pages of homework so that there were no smudges or blots or crossings out. I adore the kindness and comradeship of the blogosphere, yet, despite all the encouragement and generous words, there is still a voice in my head which insists I am not doing it quite right. Even though I sort of know there is no Right.

I think, on this glorious sunny Monday, I am going to put these absurd nagging doubts aside, and just say Thank You. I dedicate the award to all you dear readers, without whom this would be nothing.

The rules are: you say seven things about yourself, and then pass the award on.

So, my seven things:

1.  The first album I ever bought was Songs of Love and Hate by Leonard Cohen. I was nine. Go figure.

2.  My favourite novel in the whole world is The Great Gatsby, followed closely by The Sun Also Rises. I love Mrs Parker and Mrs Woolf. For comfort reading, I go back again and again to Nancy Mitford. I can recite quite long chunks of Love in a Cold Climate and The Pursuit of Love. I don't really understand people who say they don't read.

3.  I take an absurd pride in my ability to make really good soup.

4.  When I was younger, my secret ambition was to be a backing singer. I wanted to be one of those shimmying women who went woo woo do bop wop. I have recently had to admit to myself that this is never going to happen. (I also once quite seriously wanted to be a professional backgammon player.)

5.  I am embarrassingly bad at: tennis, cryptic crosswords, skiing, sewing, mathematics, poker, remembering where I left my keys, keeping my bag tidy, filing, and making any form of bread except for soda bread.

6.  I am in a state of constant awe and wonder at the loveliness of my female friends. They are brave, funny, elegant, clever and kind, and I could not exist without them. (I love the boys too, of course, but it the women who take my breath away.)

7.  I take an odd delight in the fact that I can type at 75 words a minute.

And now for the passing it on part. I have my very old favourites, whom I mention quite often here, so I thought I would highlight three new discoveries. They are:

Lou, Boos and Shoes, which is not only utterly charming but also one of the most aesthetically pleasing blogs I have ever seen.

This led me to another gloriously visual blog, The Bottom of The Ironing Basket, which is a perfect feast for the eyes.

I read quite a lot of wordy blogs, which I love, but a couple of weeks ago I had a sudden desire to gaze upon beautiful photographs, and I rummaged around the internet in search of prettiness. That was how I found these two, and they are packed full of delightful photographic treats.

Another one new to me is Fashion's Most Wanted. Despite the name, it is about much more than fashion. It is a great combination of life in Dalston, pictures of style icons, general musings, and excellent quotations from interesting women.

There we are my darlings. Now I am back to the election. I leave you with some pictures of the one thing I did not have to include on my list of seven, because you all already know of my absurd and irredeemable love for my two old ladies, who spent last night basking in the spring sunshine:

dogs garden April 25th 056

dogs garden April 25th 082

dogs garden April 25th 062

dogs garden April 25th 070

(Now they are getting on in years, their faces have taken on a faraway philosophical expression. Unless of course they see a rabbit or a biscuit, in which case they revert to the frantic puppiness of youth.)

dogs garden April 25th 061

LinkWithin

Blog Widget by LinkWithin